<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Linkerd on 黄文卓 | DevOps Engineer</title>
    <link>https://socake.github.io/tags/linkerd/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Linkerd on 黄文卓 | DevOps Engineer</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>zh-CN</language>
    <managingEditor>17691281867@163.com (Wenzhuo Huang)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>17691281867@163.com (Wenzhuo Huang)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026 Wenzhuo Huang</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://socake.github.io/tags/linkerd/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Service Mesh 技术选型：Istio vs Cilium vs Linkerd 深度对比</title>
      <link>https://socake.github.io/posts/service-mesh-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <author>17691281867@163.com (Wenzhuo Huang)</author>
      <guid>https://socake.github.io/posts/service-mesh-comparison/</guid>
      <description>Istio、Cilium Service Mesh、Linkerd 三种方案各有侧重：Istio 功能最全但最重，Cilium 基于 eBPF 性能最优，Linkerd 最轻量最易运维。本文从架构、性能、功能、运维四个维度全面拆解，帮助架构师做出有数据支撑的选型决策。</description>
      <media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://socake.github.io/posts/service-mesh-comparison/featured.jpg" />
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
